Assessment work suits people who enjoy being the one asking the awkward question, and who can then defend the answer in a room where nobody wants to hear it. It does not suit people who need to be liked by the team they are examining.
You will be paid to say the thing everyone in the room already suspects.
On a typical engagement you get three weeks inside somebody else's estate, full access, and a mandate to find out what is actually true. Then you write it down, score it against a published rubric, price the repair, and sit in front of the people who built it while they push back. Some of them will be right, and correcting a finding in public is part of the job rather than a failure of it.
No role that fits? Write to us anyway with one thing you found in a system that everyone else had missed, and what you did about it. That tells us more than a CV does.
Send one paragraph on the hardest technical problem you have had to explain to someone who did not want to hear it, plus a link to your work. A partner reads every email and responds within 48 hours.